WORD 'N PLACES

Roman Catholics are taught to make the "sign of the cross" when praying, without which prayers are not complete. In every aspect of believers' exercise of faith, the cross has a part and it is being called holy. Is it God? By comparison, Christ called the Father in heaven as "Father" but Roman Catholicism is calling the Father in Vatican City as "Holy Father". Also, the body of Christ is not being called holy but the cross became "holy". Roman Catholicism calls it "holy" cross and adopted it as a symbol of Christianity. Is  the "sign of the cross" merely a coincidental part of a prayer? Aside from calling it holy, Roman Catholicism uses "The Name" of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, whenever followers pray, by starting and ending the prayer with a "sign of the cross" and at the same time, uses "The Name" by reciting "In the name of the Father, of the Son,

What is the relation of procreation and forbidden meat? The question can be answered by scriptural passages on procreation for animals and human beings, as follows: For animals: 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind. (Genesis 8:15, TEV). In God's Word, is there any prohibition/condition pertaining to the act to procreate for animals and birds? None. For Human Beings: 9 God blessed Noah and his sons and said, “Have many children, so that your

Human genital is a kind of meat. And it is being being forbidden to be sexually "eaten" as in "oral sex" in Genesis 9:4.  This proposition are proven by the following premises: First premise - the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat. Second premise -if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out the prohibition. In  other words, if you "eat meat with blood still in it" with no more life in  blood in meat, then the reason is no longer present, hence, no longer within the prohibition. Third premise -if you take out the blood then the result is likewise taking out life in it, thus, it will not also fall within the prohibition because the life is no longer present in meat despite the presence of blood in it. Thus, life is not sine qua non or equivalent to blood.

Knowing the circumstances when forbidden meat was prohibited is important in the interpretation of the verse related to it. In brief, together with other verses, this was spoken to Noah and his sons after the flood.  Book of Genesis can give us clues on these circumstances as the verses relating to forbidden meat were spoken when Noah and his sons were acknowledging the power of God by acts of offering sacrifices. 13 When Noah was 601 years old, on the first day of the first month, the water was gone. Noah removed the covering of the boat, looked around, and saw that the ground was getting dry. 14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry. 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went

In the previous article entitled Forbidden Meat in Book of Genesis , a question was asked whether not not the word "life" stated in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human" life to the exclusion of "animal" life. For reference, the verse is restated, to wit; 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.( Genesis 9:4, TEV ) Life is presently understood to include animal life. Due to this orientation, most believers consider the forbidden  "meat with blood still in it" as referring only to "any" animal meat and worst, even to the exclusion of human meat.  What is being mentioned in Genesis 9:4 ? But first, let us discuss the materiality of word "life" to the verse. Isn't logical that if ever you have determined life in the verse to refer only to human, then the meat and blood being mentioned in the same verse would likewise refer only to human?

Is it appropriate now to to say advance “ Merry Christmas ” to Mindanao ? Despite the fact that only destruction can convince humanity that Christmas is being celebrated to honor a “false Christ”; that December 25 is not the Christ’s birthday; that Christmas is an exercise in futility; that the alleged “holy” mass celebrated by Roman Catholic Alleged Church on Christmas is a traditional deception; and, that “The Name” was and presently used in vain to deceive the  world through  Christmas ? The required proof that Christmas is false incidentally would make that day no longer “merry”. But, fortunately, the calamity maybe able to explain clearly the scriptural truths, which are being destroyed by Roman Catholicism, opportunism, secularism which resulted to “same-sex marriage” and reproductive health law, and atheism.  In essence, it will be a counter-destruction of the destroyer of truths Theoretically, on Christmas day, another evidence of deception will be at hand- the s

Book of Genesis verses related to forbidden meat were spoken to Noah after the flood. Cautiously,  when someone prohibits an act right after a very traumatic event, such as flood, the essence of the prohibition is more related to the root causes of the event. The statement is " The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it ."  Everybody, including preachers, believed that the prohibition focuses on the literal meat that even children may eat, however, as will be presented in the series of articles, the meat that is being prohibited will unlikely be eaten by children but will be vigorously eaten by the adults.  Specifically, the verses will be discussed in relation to " same-sex marriage " , including " oral sex " , " eating uncooked meat ", sodomy and reproductive health law. The influence of United States through "same-sex marriage" shall also be discussed, including the Philippine reproductive healt

Poem on His coming Limited in words and limited in time Allow me to offer this poem before He comes It was not easy for me to understand I needed guidance so that His Will is done.