Saturday, September 12, 2015

Is Jesus Christ falsified?


Are there falsities in JesuChrist, which make the name merely a product of man's imagination and foolishness? Specifically, is Jesus Christ a real person in terms of authenticity of the name, authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and practices being attached to him by false Christians?

(Source of photo: YaohĂș Servo Yaohushua’s facebook page).
Or was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah?

Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14, which is a prophecy for Vatican City, being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11).

Included in the prophecy is also a judgment for idolatrous nations, one of which is Brazil (Habakkuk 2:18-20), due to its Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio De JaneiroPhilippines and Nepal are also included. 

The verses for Vatican City state as follows:
12 You are doomed! You founded a city on crime and built it up by murder. 13 The nations you conquered wore themselves out in useless labor, and all they have built goes up in flames. The Lord Almighty has done this. 14 But the earth will be as full of the knowledge of the Lord’s glory as the seas are full of water.(Habakkuk 2:12-14, Today's English Version)

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

What is "spiritual vaccine"?

Temple
Pope Francis, in his capacity as spiritual leader, not as medical doctor or scientist, warns against “administering a vaccine against "faith”. Logically, when he talks as a spiritual leader about vaccines, he is deem referring to "spiritual vaccine". Also, as vaccines in medical science are intended to prevent diseases, then, in spiritual sense, it follows that he is referring to "faith" as spiritual  "disease".

When he further warned against ‘administering’ the vaccine, then he logically means that he is warning against the prevention of "faith", being a disease. Specifically, the statements are quoted as follows: 
 “The pontiff said educational leaders should ask themselves “how can we proclaim Christ to a generation that is changing?”
“We must be careful not to administer a vaccine against faith to them,” the 77-year-old added.”(http://ph.news.yahoo.com)
This is related to Roman Catholic Alleged Church way of presumably recent rethinking in dealing with the ‘children’ of gay couples and divorced parents. He also said :

Monday, January 6, 2014

Is praying in public spiritually helpful?

street
Roman Catholicism headed by Pope Francis and other religious groups are fun of showing their prayer activities in public and in the house of worship. Also, followers are fun of texting their prayers to others to impress them of their efforts. But is this the kind of prayer that was taught by Christ?To guide the readers, quoted  is the substance of the scripture used by the Roman Catholic Alleged Church:
5 “When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites! They love to stand up and pray in the houses of worship and on the street corners, so that everyone will see them. I assure you, they have already been paid in full. 6 But when you pray, go to your room, close the door, and pray to your Father, who is unseen. And your Father, who sees what you do in private, will reward you.

7 “When you pray, do not use a lot of meaningless words, as the pagans do, who think that their gods will hear them because their prayers are long. 8 Do not be like them. Your Father already knows what you need before you ask him. 9 This, then, is how you should pray:

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Cross is God?

Magellan's Cross
Roman Catholics are taught to make the "sign of the cross" when praying, without which prayers are not complete. In every aspect of believers' exercise of faith, the cross has a part and it is being called holy. Is it God?

By comparison, Christ called the Father in heaven as "Father" but Roman Catholicism is calling the Father in Vatican City as "Holy Father". Also, the body of Christ is not being called holy but the cross became "holy". Roman Catholicism calls it "holy" cross and adopted it as a symbol of Christianity. Is  the "sign of the cross" merely a coincidental part of a prayer?

Aside from calling it holy, Roman Catholicism uses "The Name" of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, whenever followers pray, by starting and ending the prayer with a "sign of the cross" and at the same time, uses "The Name" by reciting "In the name of the Father, of the Son, and the Holy Spirit..Amen".

This ceremony spiritually put the image of the cross over and above "The name" considering that cross is only one and "The Name" being quoted pertains to three persons, thus, the cross, by way of a traditional deception, is being phrased three times (3x) more than "The Name".

Also, the symbolism in prayer has the semblance of alpha-omega or beginning-ending, which is being superficially understood by Roman Catholics as referring to Christ. But in practice, they are actually phrasing the "image of the cross" in prayer, which is never necessary when praying to the real Father in heaven and referring to the cross as the alpha-omega instead of Christ.

It was later discovered that this image is also located in heaven.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Procreation and forbidden meat

ice cream
What is the relation of procreation and forbidden meat? The question can be answered by scriptural passages on procreation for animals and human beings, as follows:

For animals:
15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their
wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind. (Genesis 8:15, TEV).
In God's Word, is there any prohibition/condition pertaining to the act to procreate for animals and birds? None.

For Human Beings:
9 God blessed Noah and his sons and said, “Have many children, so that your

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Genital is the forbidden meat

cabinet
Human genital is a kind of meat. And it is being being forbidden to be sexually "eaten" as in "oral sex" in Genesis 9:4.  This proposition are proven by the following premises:

First premise- the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat.

Second premise-if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out the prohibition. In  other words, if you "eat meat with blood still in it" with no more life in  blood in meat, then the reason is no longer present, hence,
no longer within the prohibition.

Third premise-if you take out the blood then the result is likewise taking out life in it, thus, it will not also fall within the prohibition because the life is no longer present in meat despite the presence of blood in it. Thus, life is not sine qua non or equivalent to blood.

In fine, what is being referred in the verse is an alive meat because there is still life in blood in  an alive meat.To reiterate, quoted below is Genesis 9:4, for reference:
 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it; I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV)
Fourth premises-the use of verb eat in the verse, which can not be done literally on alive meat, the verb "bite" being the appropriate word, can drive one into a conclusion that it's use is not to be understood literally but empirically, as in "oral sex" or sexually eating the human genitals.

Friday, December 20, 2013

Circumstances in forbidden meat

Cebu Taoist temple
Knowing the circumstances when forbidden meat was prohibited is important in the interpretation of the verse related to it. In brief, together with other verses, this was spoken to Noah and his sons after the flood. 

Book of Genesis can give us clues on these circumstances as the verses relating to forbidden meat were spoken when Noah and his sons were acknowledging the power of God by acts of offering sacrifices.
13 When Noah was 601 years old, on the first day of the first month, the water was gone. Noah
removed the covering of the boat, looked around, and saw that the ground was getting dry. 14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry.

15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind.

20 Noah built an altar to the Lord; he took one of each kind of ritually clean animal and bird, and burned them whole as a sacrifice on the altar. (Genesis 8:13-20, TEV)
In verse 20, it gives us the clue that there are two types of animals(1) ritually clean and (2) not ritually clean. But what is stated in the succeeding verse is about the odor of the sacrifice, not about the odor of the ritually clean animals:
21 The odor of the sacrifice pleased the Lord, and he said to himself, “Never again will I put the earth under a curse because of what people do; I know that from the time they are young their thoughts are evil.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Life in Forbidden Meat

visitor
In the previous article entitled Forbidden Meat in Book of Genesis, a question was asked whether not not the word "life" stated in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human" life to the exclusion of "animal" life. For reference, the verse is restated, to wit;
4The one thing you must not eat is meat
with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV)
Life is presently understood to include animal life. Due to this orientation, most believers consider the forbidden  "meat with blood still in it" as referring only to "any" animal meat and worst, even to the exclusion of human meat. 

What is being mentioned in Genesis 9:4?

But first, let us discuss the materiality of word "life" to the verse. Isn't logical that if ever you have determined life in the verse to refer only to human, then the meat and blood being mentioned in the same verse would likewise refer only to human?

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Advance "Merry" Christmas to Mindanao?

lobby
Is it appropriate now to to say advance “Merry Christmas” to Mindanao? Despite the fact that only destruction can convince humanity that Christmas is being celebrated to honor a “false Christ”; that December 25 is not the Christ’s birthday; that Christmas is an exercise in futility; that the alleged “holy” mass celebrated by Roman Catholic Alleged Church on Christmas is a traditional deception; and, that “The Name” was and presently used in vain to deceive the  world through  Christmas?

The required proof that Christmas is false incidentally would make that day no longer “merry”. But, fortunately, the calamity maybe able to explain clearly the scriptural truths, which are being destroyed by Roman Catholicism, opportunism, secularism which resulted to “same-sex marriage” and reproductive health law, and atheism.  In essence, it will be a counter-destruction of the destroyer of truths Theoretically, on Christmas day, another evidence of deception will be at hand-the statistics of dead bodies

In the Philippines, instead of treating the continuing calamities as a “curse” after Typhoon

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Forbidden Meat in Book of Genesis

Ceiling
Book of Genesis verses related to forbidden meat were spoken to Noah after the flood. Cautiously,  when someone prohibits an act right after a very traumatic event, such as flood, the essence of the prohibition is more related to the root causes of the event.

The statement is "The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it." 

Everybody, including preachers, believed that the prohibition focuses on the literal meat that even children may eat, however, as will be presented in the series of articles, the meat that is being prohibited will unlikely be eaten by children but will be vigorously eaten by the adults. 

Specifically, the verses will be discussed in relation to "same-sex marriage", including "oral sex", "eating uncooked meat", sodomy and reproductive health law. The influence of United States through "same-sex marriage" shall also be discussed, including the Philippine reproductive health law and its repercussions.

Monday, December 9, 2013

Watch for His coming

Skull
Poem on His coming

Limited in words and limited in time
Allow me to offer this poem before He comes
It was not easy for me to understand
I needed guidance so that His Will is done.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Pope Francis: "Greed is idolatry?"

adidas
Pope Francis does not like "money" to be idolized. On deeper analysis however, it would turn out that he was referring to "greed" in money being constitutive of idolatry. But. is the use of word "idolatry" appropriate for "greed'? Before we discuss this questionable use of word "greed" in "idolatry", let us first quote the report in www.rawstory.com.
"Speaking at daily Mass on Monday, Pope Francis condemned the worship of money."
"Though money itself was not inherently evil, Francis said the attachment to money lead to destruction of families, friends, and the self".

“It leads you to idolatry, it destroys your relationship with others,” he said, according to Radio Vatican. “It’s not money, but the attitude, what we call greed. Then too this greed makes you sick, because it makes you think of everything in terms of money. It destroys you, it makes you sick.”

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Pope and Obama, not happy?

Cebu City Guiitar
The Philippine Star November 12, 2013 headline reads: "Pope, Obama deeply saddened". Is it a joke? It further says: "Deeply saddened by the destruction and loss of life caused by the super typhoon, His Holiness Pope Francis expresses his heartfelt with all those affected by this storm and its aftermath". Parolin said in the telegram according to CPCP
News.

Does the writer really believe that the Pope was saddened and he has still the heart?And he believes that the Pope is Holy? 

It further added: "In praying for the people of the Philippines, the Holy Father likewise offers encouragement to the civil authorities and emergency personnel as they assist the victims of this storm. He invokes divine blessings of strength and consolation for the nation," the Vatican added. Did the writer really believe that the Pope knows how to pray to God while publicly usurping the title of the "Holy Father"?